Tonight's Republican Debate

Tonight is the first Republican debate which includes Rootin’ Tutin’ Rick Perry. This could actually be the most important debate because Perry has a chance to all but win the race with a command performance. Even if he doesn’t, some of the others are facing irrelevance if they don’t get noticed tonight. Here is your playbook for the debate. Feel free to share your hopes and dreams for the debate. Go ahead and gamble on the likely winners and losers -- house fee is 2%. And check back later for updates anyone feels like posting.

● Rick Perry: To borrow a Texanism, Perry needs to show that he's not all hat and no cattle. If Perry puts on a strong performance tonight and shows himself to be more comfortable on stage than the rest, then the race is all but over. But if he stumbles, that could be catastrophic for him as it may expose him as a Paper Texan. In other words, it could be nominee or bust tonight. To prove himself, Perry needs to show a command of national issues and an ability to take the expected pounding from the rest without getting flustered.

● What's his name. . . that other guy. . .: Mitch Romski needs to remind people that he was once a front-runner and he needs to hope that Perry and Bachman kill each other in a duel, because short of their deaths, he’s not going to win the primary. Alternatively, the Romster needs to really take command of this debate and show that he’s got a stronger personality than Perry and more passion than Bachmann. But I honestly don’t think he has that in him. He’s a technocrat with moderate instincts. Indeed, take a look at the economic plan he released yesterday: it has 59 points and none of them are all that interesting. . . it's like reading a tax form. Good luck trying to get anyone with a pulse to listen to that. So watch for the Romster to just try to not make a fool of himself and watch for signs he's stuffed voodoo dolls in his pockets.

● Michelle Bachmann: Bachmann needs to show she's still relevant now that Rick Perry has sucked the air out of the room. In the past few weeks, she lost all her momentum to Perry. She's disappeared in the polls. She’s raised questions about her health (migraines), and she continued to make a series of gaffes that let the media portray her as a nutjob. Now her campaign staff is resigning at the worst possible time. She needs to come up with an incredible economic plan and she needs to mercilessly butcher Rick Perry tonight if she wants to avoid irrelevance.

● Ron Paul: No real expectations here. Paul will do his thing and will win the internet polls, and no one will care.

● Jon Huntsman: I've got two thoughts on Jon-boy Huntsman. First, he put out a fairly decent economic plan the other day, but I don't believe it because his economic plan doesn’t match his record. That’s why Huntsman keeps polling less than 1% support among Republicans and why he’s not going to do any better any time soon -- because he has a record that is counter to Republican beliefs.

Here’s my other thought on Huntsman. Having spent his time blasting the Republican Party and basically praising Obama, and clearly running so far to the left that no one except an idiot (like Jeb Bush's boy) would support him on the Republican ticket, I find myself wondering if Huntsman might not be an Obama plant? This is pure speculation, but would it surprise anyone if Huntsman replaced Biden on the Obama ticket at some point next summer in the name of "bipartisanship"? Watch for a lot of winking from Huntsman into the camera every time he praises the O.

● Herman Cain: The Hermanator is playing for the future. His best bet this time around would be to get the nod as VP. To that end, I recommend he go on the offensive and prove he can take down Rick Perry. The role of the VP is attack dog, and if Cain can show he can hold his own against the biggest politician in the race, then he raises his profile and his appeal as a VP all at once. Cain also needs to drop the businessman “I don’t know what I don’t know” honesty and pick up a bit more of the politician “I know everything” swagger.

● Thaddeus McCotter: McCotter is playing for the future as well. He really needs to make himself memorable, because 0%+/- of the public knows who he is. Based on his likely appeal, his best bet would be to offer a series of bold new ideas no one else has mentioned and turn himself into the ideas candidate, i.e. replace Newt. . . but in a good way. This would position him well for 2016 and 2020. If he wants to play for VP instead, which is possible as he hails from blue state Michigan, then he needs to follow the Hermanator strategy and come out swinging tonight.

● Newt Gingrich/Rick Santorum: These guys are wasting everybody’s time. The public’s view of both is fixed and both have too many skeletons already out of the closet to change any minds. I suspect both are playing to gain credibility so they can have healthy think-tank careers. Hence, they are likely to focus tonight on the areas about which they want to tank in the future.

● Obama: After the whole re-scheduling fiasco, Obama should probably keep a low profile tonight. But he won’t. He’ll try to make some statement to save face (like his new $300 billion Stimulus 4: Revenge of Stimulus) and distract from the debate. . . and will make a fool of himself all over again.

Thoughts?

Tonight's Republican Debate

Category : Republicans

Tonight is the first Republican debate which includes Rootin’ Tutin’ Rick Perry. This could actually be the most important debate because Perry has a chance to all but win the race with a command performance. Even if he doesn’t, some of the others are facing irrelevance if they don’t get noticed tonight. Here is your playbook for the debate. Feel free to share your hopes and dreams for the debate. Go ahead and gamble on the likely winners and losers -- house fee is 2%. And check back later for updates anyone feels like posting.

● Rick Perry: To borrow a Texanism, Perry needs to show that he's not all hat and no cattle. If Perry puts on a strong performance tonight and shows himself to be more comfortable on stage than the rest, then the race is all but over. But if he stumbles, that could be catastrophic for him as it may expose him as a Paper Texan. In other words, it could be nominee or bust tonight. To prove himself, Perry needs to show a command of national issues and an ability to take the expected pounding from the rest without getting flustered.

● What's his name. . . that other guy. . .: Mitch Romski needs to remind people that he was once a front-runner and he needs to hope that Perry and Bachman kill each other in a duel, because short of their deaths, he’s not going to win the primary. Alternatively, the Romster needs to really take command of this debate and show that he’s got a stronger personality than Perry and more passion than Bachmann. But I honestly don’t think he has that in him. He’s a technocrat with moderate instincts. Indeed, take a look at the economic plan he released yesterday: it has 59 points and none of them are all that interesting. . . it's like reading a tax form. Good luck trying to get anyone with a pulse to listen to that. So watch for the Romster to just try to not make a fool of himself and watch for signs he's stuffed voodoo dolls in his pockets.

● Michelle Bachmann: Bachmann needs to show she's still relevant now that Rick Perry has sucked the air out of the room. In the past few weeks, she lost all her momentum to Perry. She's disappeared in the polls. She’s raised questions about her health (migraines), and she continued to make a series of gaffes that let the media portray her as a nutjob. Now her campaign staff is resigning at the worst possible time. She needs to come up with an incredible economic plan and she needs to mercilessly butcher Rick Perry tonight if she wants to avoid irrelevance.

● Ron Paul: No real expectations here. Paul will do his thing and will win the internet polls, and no one will care.

● Jon Huntsman: I've got two thoughts on Jon-boy Huntsman. First, he put out a fairly decent economic plan the other day, but I don't believe it because his economic plan doesn’t match his record. That’s why Huntsman keeps polling less than 1% support among Republicans and why he’s not going to do any better any time soon -- because he has a record that is counter to Republican beliefs.

Here’s my other thought on Huntsman. Having spent his time blasting the Republican Party and basically praising Obama, and clearly running so far to the left that no one except an idiot (like Jeb Bush's boy) would support him on the Republican ticket, I find myself wondering if Huntsman might not be an Obama plant? This is pure speculation, but would it surprise anyone if Huntsman replaced Biden on the Obama ticket at some point next summer in the name of "bipartisanship"? Watch for a lot of winking from Huntsman into the camera every time he praises the O.

● Herman Cain: The Hermanator is playing for the future. His best bet this time around would be to get the nod as VP. To that end, I recommend he go on the offensive and prove he can take down Rick Perry. The role of the VP is attack dog, and if Cain can show he can hold his own against the biggest politician in the race, then he raises his profile and his appeal as a VP all at once. Cain also needs to drop the businessman “I don’t know what I don’t know” honesty and pick up a bit more of the politician “I know everything” swagger.

● Thaddeus McCotter: McCotter is playing for the future as well. He really needs to make himself memorable, because 0%+/- of the public knows who he is. Based on his likely appeal, his best bet would be to offer a series of bold new ideas no one else has mentioned and turn himself into the ideas candidate, i.e. replace Newt. . . but in a good way. This would position him well for 2016 and 2020. If he wants to play for VP instead, which is possible as he hails from blue state Michigan, then he needs to follow the Hermanator strategy and come out swinging tonight.

● Newt Gingrich/Rick Santorum: These guys are wasting everybody’s time. The public’s view of both is fixed and both have too many skeletons already out of the closet to change any minds. I suspect both are playing to gain credibility so they can have healthy think-tank careers. Hence, they are likely to focus tonight on the areas about which they want to tank in the future.

● Obama: After the whole re-scheduling fiasco, Obama should probably keep a low profile tonight. But he won’t. He’ll try to make some statement to save face (like his new $300 billion Stimulus 4: Revenge of Stimulus) and distract from the debate. . . and will make a fool of himself all over again.

Thoughts?

"This Best Selling Tends to SELL OUT VERY FAST! If this is a MUST HAVE product, be sure to Order Now to avoid disappointment!"

Best Beyblade Ever - Austerity

Best Beyblade Ever Amazon Product, Find and Compare Prices Online.

Tonight is the first Republican debate which includes Rootin’ Tutin’ Rick Perry. This could actually be the most important debate because Perry has a chance to all but win the race with a command performance. Even if he doesn’t, some of the others are facing irrelevance if they don’t get noticed tonight. Here is your playbook for the debate. Feel free to share your hopes and dreams for the debate. Go ahead and gamble on the likely winners and losers -- house fee is 2%. And check back later for updates anyone feels like posting.

● Rick Perry: To borrow a Texanism, Perry needs to show that he's not all hat and no cattle. If Perry puts on a strong performance tonight and shows himself to be more comfortable on stage than the rest, then the race is all but over. But if he stumbles, that could be catastrophic for him as it may expose him as a Paper Texan. In other words, it could be nominee or bust tonight. To prove himself, Perry needs to show a command of national issues and an ability to take the expected pounding from the rest without getting flustered.

● What's his name. . . that other guy. . .: Mitch Romski needs to remind people that he was once a front-runner and he needs to hope that Perry and Bachman kill each other in a duel, because short of their deaths, he’s not going to win the primary. Alternatively, the Romster needs to really take command of this debate and show that he’s got a stronger personality than Perry and more passion than Bachmann. But I honestly don’t think he has that in him. He’s a technocrat with moderate instincts. Indeed, take a look at the economic plan he released yesterday: it has 59 points and none of them are all that interesting. . . it's like reading a tax form. Good luck trying to get anyone with a pulse to listen to that. So watch for the Romster to just try to not make a fool of himself and watch for signs he's stuffed voodoo dolls in his pockets.

● Michelle Bachmann: Bachmann needs to show she's still relevant now that Rick Perry has sucked the air out of the room. In the past few weeks, she lost all her momentum to Perry. She's disappeared in the polls. She’s raised questions about her health (migraines), and she continued to make a series of gaffes that let the media portray her as a nutjob. Now her campaign staff is resigning at the worst possible time. She needs to come up with an incredible economic plan and she needs to mercilessly butcher Rick Perry tonight if she wants to avoid irrelevance.

● Ron Paul: No real expectations here. Paul will do his thing and will win the internet polls, and no one will care.

● Jon Huntsman: I've got two thoughts on Jon-boy Huntsman. First, he put out a fairly decent economic plan the other day, but I don't believe it because his economic plan doesn’t match his record. That’s why Huntsman keeps polling less than 1% support among Republicans and why he’s not going to do any better any time soon -- because he has a record that is counter to Republican beliefs.

Here’s my other thought on Huntsman. Having spent his time blasting the Republican Party and basically praising Obama, and clearly running so far to the left that no one except an idiot (like Jeb Bush's boy) would support him on the Republican ticket, I find myself wondering if Huntsman might not be an Obama plant? This is pure speculation, but would it surprise anyone if Huntsman replaced Biden on the Obama ticket at some point next summer in the name of "bipartisanship"? Watch for a lot of winking from Huntsman into the camera every time he praises the O.

● Herman Cain: The Hermanator is playing for the future. His best bet this time around would be to get the nod as VP. To that end, I recommend he go on the offensive and prove he can take down Rick Perry. The role of the VP is attack dog, and if Cain can show he can hold his own against the biggest politician in the race, then he raises his profile and his appeal as a VP all at once. Cain also needs to drop the businessman “I don’t know what I don’t know” honesty and pick up a bit more of the politician “I know everything” swagger.

● Thaddeus McCotter: McCotter is playing for the future as well. He really needs to make himself memorable, because 0%+/- of the public knows who he is. Based on his likely appeal, his best bet would be to offer a series of bold new ideas no one else has mentioned and turn himself into the ideas candidate, i.e. replace Newt. . . but in a good way. This would position him well for 2016 and 2020. If he wants to play for VP instead, which is possible as he hails from blue state Michigan, then he needs to follow the Hermanator strategy and come out swinging tonight.

● Newt Gingrich/Rick Santorum: These guys are wasting everybody’s time. The public’s view of both is fixed and both have too many skeletons already out of the closet to change any minds. I suspect both are playing to gain credibility so they can have healthy think-tank careers. Hence, they are likely to focus tonight on the areas about which they want to tank in the future.

● Obama: After the whole re-scheduling fiasco, Obama should probably keep a low profile tonight. But he won’t. He’ll try to make some statement to save face (like his new $300 billion Stimulus 4: Revenge of Stimulus) and distract from the debate. . . and will make a fool of himself all over again.

Thoughts?

Product Title : Tonight's Republican Debate

Tonight's Republican Debate,

Republicans,

Tonight's Republican Debate